Portfolio construction
Minimum variance portfolio
The calmest possible mix of the tickers: it ignores expected returns and minimises volatility.
सरल शब्दों में विचार
Expected returns are hard to estimate; risk is much easier. The minimum-variance portfolio uses only the covariance matrix and finds the left tip of the efficient frontier. It favours low-volatility tickers and those that hedge each other.
गणना कैसे होती है
Minimise the portfolio variance with the weights adding up to 1 (long only by default, capped by the maximum weight).
minimise wᵀΣw
subject to Σwᵢ = 1, 0 ≤ wᵢ ≤ w_max
Unconstrained: w = Σ⁻¹1 ÷ (1ᵀΣ⁻¹1)इसका उपयोग कैसे करें
- As a defensive core when you care about smoothness more than return.
- Cap the maximum weight; otherwise it often puts most of the money in the single calmest ticker.
- Compare its OOS volatility with its in-sample one: it usually holds up well.
निष्कर्ष निकालना
- High weight in one ticker is normal for this model; it is not a recommendation for that ticker, only its lowest-risk role.
- Low expected return is the expected price of low risk.
उदाहरण
Running example (used in every portfolio guide): US500, GER40, gold (XAUUSD) and EURUSD, two years of daily data. Expected returns 8%, 7%, 7% and 1% a year; volatilities 18%, 20%, 15% and 7%. US500 and GER40 move together (correlation about 0.7); gold hardly moves with the indices (about 0.04). Minimum variance: 8% US500, 6% gold, 86% EURUSD. Volatility 6.8% (the lowest of all), return 1.9%, Sharpe 0.28, maximum drawdown −8.6%. With a 40% maximum weight it would have to spread across all four.
उदाहरण के इनपुट केवल समझाने के लिए हैं; वेट और आँकड़े वही हैं जो हमारा ऑप्टिमाइज़र उनके लिए लौटाता है।
इन बातों का ध्यान रखें
- Concentration: the effective number of tickers here is only 1.3.
- Low volatility in the past does not guarantee it in the future (a calm currency can devalue).
थोड़ा इतिहास
Implicit in Markowitz (1952). It gained a following after Haugen and Baker (1991) and Clarke, de Silva and Thorley (2006) found that minimum-variance stock portfolios had matched or beaten the market with much less risk, the "low-volatility anomaly".
केवल शैक्षिक सामग्री। कोई पोर्टफ़ोलियो मॉडल भविष्य नहीं जानता: हर एक अतीत के अनुमानों पर काम करता है, और यहाँ कुछ भी निवेश सलाह नहीं है।