Portfolio construction
Kelly criterion
The bet size that makes your money grow fastest over the long run, if your estimates of return and risk were exactly right.
用通俗的话解释
Bet too little and you grow slowly; bet too much and the losses compound into ruin. In between there is a size that maximises the long-run growth rate of wealth. For a portfolio of tickers with normal-like returns it is the inverse covariance matrix times the expected excess returns, which usually means leverage.
计算方法
Maximise expected return − ½ × variance (the growth rate of a continuously rebalanced portfolio). Long only by default; the result is scaled down to the maximum leverage if it exceeds it. The part not invested is cash.
Growth rate g(w) ≈ wᵀ(μ − r_f) − ½ wᵀΣw
Kelly: w* = Σ⁻¹(μ − r_f)
One ticker: f* = (μ − r_f) ÷ σ² Coin flip: f* = p − (1 − p) ÷ b如何使用
- As an upper bound: never bet more than Kelly, because beyond it you get more risk and less growth.
- Prefer Fractional Kelly for real use.
- Watch the "full Kelly would use …× leverage" note in the study.
得出结论
- Full Kelly expects drawdowns of 50% or more along the way, even when the estimates are right.
- If it is capped by the maximum leverage, the cap, not Kelly, is setting your size.
示例
Running example (used in every portfolio guide): US500, GER40, gold (XAUUSD) and EURUSD, two years of daily data. Expected returns 8%, 7%, 7% and 1% a year; volatilities 18%, 20%, 15% and 7%. US500 and GER40 move together (correlation about 0.7); gold hardly moves with the indices (about 0.04). One ticker: US500 with 8% return and 18% volatility has f* = 0.08 ÷ 0.0324 = 2.5 times the capital. For the four tickers, full Kelly wants 5.4× leverage; capped at the 2× maximum it holds 80% US500, 10% GER40 and 111% gold: 14.8% expected return, 23.4% volatility.
示例的输入仅作说明;权重和数据是我们的优化器针对这些输入给出的结果。
注意事项
- Overestimate returns by a little and Kelly overbets by a lot; overbetting is far worse than underbetting.
- It assumes you can rebalance continuously and that the estimates hold.
一点历史
John L. Kelly Jr. at Bell Labs, "A New Interpretation of Information Rate" (1956), about gamblers with a noisy private wire. Edward Thorp used it for blackjack (Beat the Dealer, 1962) and then in his hedge fund.
仅供学习参考。 没有任何投资组合模型知道未来:每一个都基于对过去的估计,本页内容均不构成投资建议。