Portfolio construction

CVaR optimisation (minimum expected shortfall)

The mix with the smallest average loss on its worst days, measured on the real history rather than a bell curve.

2 min de lecture · Essayer dans l’optimiseur de portefeuille ↗

L’idée en termes simples

Minimum variance treats a gain and a loss alike. CVaR optimisation looks only at the bad tail: on the 5% worst days (or the level you choose), how much did the portfolio lose on average? It picks the weights that make that number smallest, so tickers that crash together are avoided even if their ordinary volatility is low.

Mode de calcul

Over the daily scenarios, CVaR is VaR plus the average loss beyond VaR. Rockafellar and Uryasev showed it can be minimised directly; the optimiser uses projected subgradient steps over the history.

CVaR_α(w) = min_z { z + (1 ÷ ((1 − α)T)) Σₜ max(0, −wᵀrₜ − z) }
minimise CVaR_α(w)  subject to  Σwᵢ = 1, 0 ≤ wᵢ ≤ w_max

Comment l’utiliser

  • When crash days matter most to you: drawdown-sensitive money, leveraged accounts.
  • Set the level under Settings (95% by default; 97.5% looks further into the tail).
  • Use three or more years of data so the tail has enough days.

Tirer des conclusions

  • The study's notes show the average loss on the worst days for the chosen mix.
  • Results close to minimum variance mean the tails are roughly normal.

Exemple

Running example (used in every portfolio guide): US500, GER40, gold (XAUUSD) and EURUSD, two years of daily data. Expected returns 8%, 7%, 7% and 1% a year; volatilities 18%, 20%, 15% and 7%. US500 and GER40 move together (correlation about 0.7); gold hardly moves with the indices (about 0.04). CVaR optimisation: 7% US500, 14% gold, 79% EURUSD. Average loss on the worst 5% of days 0.90% (equal weights: 1.31%). Compared with minimum variance it holds more gold (14% against 6%), which had milder bad days than its volatility suggests.

Les données d’entrée de l’exemple sont illustratives ; les pondérations et les chiffres sont ceux que renvoie notre optimiseur.

Points de vigilance

  • Few tail days means a noisy estimate; the weights can jump between studies.
  • It protects against the tails that happened, not against new kinds of crisis.

Un peu d’histoire

R. Tyrrell Rockafellar and Stanislav Uryasev, "Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk" (Journal of Risk, 2000). CVaR (expected shortfall) is now the regulatory measure of bank trading risk.

Contenu éducatif uniquement. Aucun modèle de portefeuille ne connaît l’avenir : chacun repose sur des estimations tirées du passé, et rien ici ne constitue un conseil en investissement.